Naming conventions for Wikipedia articles on Plato's texts
Update - Francis Schonken 12:23, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
The new scheme has been implemented as fair as I could, note however:
- Move requests at Wikipedia:Requested_moves#March_13.2C_2005 for Phaedo -> Phaedo (Plato) and Parmenides (dialogue) -> Parmenides (Plato)
- I tried to solve all second level disambiguation issues, but improvements might still be necessary, see for example: Sisyphus, Halcyon, Demodocus, Ion, Lysis, Republic, Letters, Laws, Symposium, Apology.
The proposed scheme
Naming of articles treating Plato's dialogues seperately is confusing, I propose following renamings (per tetralogy):
- note 1: Since
- works marked (1) (scholars don't generally agree that Plato is the author)
- and
- works marked (2) (scholars generally agree that Plato is not the author of the work)
- might lead to discussion if marked "(Plato)", I'd mark these "(dialogue)", except where these works are no dialogues.
- note 2: This proposition is on Talk:Plato too – I propose to have the discussion here
--Francis Schonken 12:56, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- I.
- II.
- III.
- IV.
- V.
- Theages (2) -> Theages (dialogue)
- Charmides (Plato) (OK!)
- Laches (Plato) (OK!)
- Lysis -> Lysis (Plato)
- VI.
- VII.
- VIII.
- IX.
Remaining works (most of them considered spurious already in antiquity):
- Axiochus (2) (OK!)
- Definitions (Plato) (2) (OK!)
- Demodocus (2) (OK!)
- Epigrams (Plato) (OK!)
- Eryxias (2) (OK!)
- Halcyon (2) (OK?)
- On Justice (2) (OK!)
- On Virtue (2) (OK!)
- Sisyphus (Plato) (2) -> Sisyphus (dialogue) (or treating this work in the Sisyphus article?)